1. RESULTS OF 6TH, 7TH, 8TH GRADE PARENT MEETING
AN EXCITING LOOK TOWARD NEXT YEAR The teachers and I have been in conversation regarding next year, and how to enrich our school programs so that our present excellence continues to flourish and grow. In sixth, seventh, and eighth grade classes we are planning some modifications, especially in some subject areas, where diversity among students is more distinct. We have been in the process of considering some of these modifications based on our own observations, and also from input from our parents. We have always taught to the goal of mastery for every student. We are committed to continuing to achieve this goal, but with the added commitment of empowering each student to achieve his or her highest potential, even above the expected standards. Because all students do not reach the goal of mastery at the same time, we have decided to incorporate a more flexible approach which will involve grouping of students according to aptitude and performance. This will not bring back the concept of tracking students according to “ability”. All students will be taught the same concepts according to national standards as always. Students will be able to move from group to group according to performance. In some cases, more coaching will be offered to students so that anxiety and stress can be lessened and at the same time, more challenge will be offered to students who are ready for it. Instruction groupings will not be entirely homeroom based. Students will be instructed in appropriate groups so that teachers are able to give more individual time to student instruction. This will become more obvious in math, but will be evident in other subject areas as well. With class sizes favorable to this type of approach, we look to this modification with enthusiasm. Scheduling will be challenging, but the teachers are committed to offering even more next year than they have already in their present teaching. TEACHER ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2010-2011 The present sixth, seventh, and eighth grade teachers will be teaching the same subjects as this year. Time assignments have been altered somewhat, but they do not affect the student programs. SIXTH GRADE The sixth grade schedule has electives, and “specials” such as music and band, Spanish, computers, and PE scheduled after lunch. These offerings and also History will be scheduled between 1:00 and 2:45 in the afternoon (with Wednesday dismissal at 1:45 as usual). For History -- Mrs. Lesniak will teach History to both classes combined in this afternoon time period. In the morning, Mrs. Leichleiter will have regular sixth grade classes. Between 1:00 and 2:45 she will perform the responsibilities of Development and Marketing Director. (Mrs. Brand who has served in this capacity has accepted the position of principal at Christ the King so will not be returning to St. Mary Magdalen next year.) SEVENTH GRADE In seventh grade the core academic subjects will also be taught mainly before 1:00. The 1:15 – 2:45 time periods will be committed to the same offerings as sixth grade. Literature and Spanish will be taught during this time also. The eighth grade teachers and classes will remain basically the same as this present year, with scheduling being similar to sixth and seventh grades. However, there will be no Honors Algebra class before school. All math classes, including accelerated classes, will be offered during the school day. I am extremely proud and appreciative of these teachers. They are totally committed to assisting each student to have a most successful and happy experience in these grades which are times are enormous growth and development, social as well as physical. Nothing for next year is “set in stone.” Your input and support are, as always, key to the success of everything we do. The best of planning can always be interrupted as circumstances change. At this time we look forward to a great “Jubilee Year”. AREAS VALUED MOST IN OUR PROGRAMS AND CURICULUM FOR SIXTH, SEVENTH, AND EIGHTH GRADERS: Weekly Masses, priests teaching religion, integration of religion throughout curriculum and behavior, respect for selves, others, and the planet, strong social skills, no bullying. Teachers’ enthusiasm and passion for teaching, teamwork of teachers, teachers’accommodating, open door philosophy. Coordination with Murphy HS for curriculum and general preparation for high school. Self-evaluation of students and communication with parents; challenging academic work. Math fair, Cribbage Club, guild fair, science fair, field trips, hands on experiences, “Reading Buddies”. Use of and integration of technology in academics. Upcoming mini-courses AREAS TO CONSIDER FOR MODIFICATION FOR NEXT YEAR: Curriculum: More art and music PE include more physical activity such as presidential fitness program Include more instruction in note-taking, research skills, term paper for 8th grade Increase lab, less text, make more challenging Keep basics such as grammar, improve writing skills; school spelling bee Look at public school curriculum such as Cascade Teach Spanish all year, not just semesters Homework: Need consistency of homework (too much some nights, not enough others) Keep websites current More communication regarding missing assignments Mark end of quarters on calendars Increase meaningful homework; teach time management in preparation for HS General: Learn to express point of view through debate. Focus on individual needs and learning styles. Help students be comfortable asking questions Communication with parents regarding new curriculum Provide privacy in grading (exchanging papers, etc.) Have free dress for everyone Field Trips: Hike somewhere; Have a ropes course for 8th grade; Olympia; Washington DC trip; Glacier hike; Salish Sea Society THE MATH DILEMNA – A curriculum that is “a mile wide and an inch deep.” Research as well as public opinion are expressing a growing dissatisfaction with the current mathematics performance of American students, especially in comparison with other industrialized nations. Almost half of the job openings in Washington between 2007 and 2012 will be in fields requiring a strong background in math or science, and already, Washington employers are importing graduates from across the United States and abroad to fill our high-tech job openings. (Legislative Report, Senator Paull Shin) Research has pointed to an underlying problem with many of our standards-based systems. There are two main approaches used in the teaching of mathematics – skill development (focus on developing computational skills and recall of facts); and problem solving (encouraging students to explain how they arrived at a solution and to consider more than one way of solving a problem). These approaches reflect the approaches used in teaching reading – the whole language approach, and the skills-based instruction approach. (Principal, p. 52) Research suggests that both can and should be done together. The challenge for the teacher is finding the time to teach both approaches and also to “cover the book.” Our SMM students perform well in mathematics, but SMM teachers and students are caught in the same dilemma that faces other Washington schools -- the challenge of teaching both approaches is weighted toward the conceptual approach. This is due partly to today’s textbook content and methodology, partly to public demand, and partly to the role WASL testing plays in our curriculum. In standardized testing (ITBS) and in high school entrance exams, our students generally do well in the math concepts, estimation, and problem solving areas. A typical SMM student, however, may have a significantly lower computation score compared to the critical thinking scores. Teachers tell me that this is partly because students cannot finish the test in the time allotted, but also because they had forgotten how to do basic math. Though these students were performing two years above their grade level in their math scores, their computation performance was a whole year behind their critical thinking scores. This brings about the issue of stressing some students by practicing for time tests (mad minutes, etc.) compared to making sure they know their “facts” by whatever method works for them. I have a personal concern regarding gimmicks because many students never outgrow their dependence on the gimmick. My goal is to have each student at SMM be able to master the memorization of the basic facts and also be able to solve fundamental math problems as well as problem solving. Lately, I have done a lot of reading regarding the development of math instruction in the curriculum of United States schools. I have separated out quotes from several sources for your interest. Together we need to address math needs in our schools not only for the sake of our present students, but for the sake of our country. Quotes Regarding Math Instruction. The National Math Panel urges that students “develop automatic recall of addition and related subtraction facts, and of multiplication and related division facts” to adequately prepare for Algebra. (ASCD SmartBrief) The following remarks are notes taken from the Washington Post. A presidential panel declared math education in the United States “broken” and called on schools to focus on ensuring that children master fundamental skills that provide the underpinnings for success in higher math and, ultimately, in high-tech jobs. The National Mathematics Advisory Panel noted that students need a deeper understanding of basic skills, including fluency with whole numbers and fractions. Scores from the 2006 Program for International Student Assessment showed 15-year-olds in the US trailed peers from 23 industrialized countries in math. The panel stressed that many students are simply befuddled by fractions. It concluded that the math curricula and textbooks in elementary and middle schools typically cover too many topics without enough depth. It noted that countries in which children do best at math, including Singapore and Japan, emphasize core topics. The Washington State Board of Education (Herald) reported that Washington’s standards place too heavy an emphasis on the conceptual and not enough on the mechanics of math. This does not mean that mechanics are more important than thinking and problem solving. Rather, it calls for a balance. This balance is what St. Magdalen School teachers are accomplishing. Next year promises to be a year of outstanding success.
posted 6/21/2010 5:31 PM
| comment
|